Should We Allow Curiosity to Kill the Cat文章翻译Science allows us to adopt dual standards in our attitude to animal welfare. We pay qualified researchers to conduct animal experiments that would land the rest of us in jail if we performed them o

Should We Allow Curiosity to Kill the Cat文章翻译Science allows us to adopt dual standards in our attitude to animal welfare. We pay qualified researchers to conduct animal experiments that would land the rest of us in jail if we performed them o
Should We Allow Curiosity to Kill the Cat文章翻译
Science allows us to adopt dual standards in our attitude to animal welfare. We pay qualified researchers to conduct animal experiments that would land the rest of us in jail if we performed them on the family pet. Society sets limits on how animals can be treated in medical or agricultural research, based on the delicate balance between the practical value of the information sought and the pain and suffering inflicted. In my opinion that's reasonable, but killing or mutilating animals for pure intellectual curiosity is not.
If we are to develop a relationship with our environment that will allow us to save it from destruction, we must recognize that other forms of life did not evolve merely for our benefit. I believe that biological and environmental ethics should be included in all biological science courses, in the same way that ethics are an integral part of medical courses. Biologists should be trained to ask themselves, on our behalf, whether the satisfaction of our collective curiosity justifies killing or mutilating an animal.
Most important, I think all scientific research papers should carry a short preface that justifies the research, in language that the average person can understand. This preface should balance the intellectual and the animals used. If experiments are being conducted on our behalf, we should be aware of the purpose and the price. This would go a long way towards dispelling fears that scientists are not accountable for their actions. It would also strengthen a belief within the scientific community that its work should be for the benefit of all life on this planet, not just humans.
急,明日要用

Should We Allow Curiosity to Kill the Cat文章翻译Science allows us to adopt dual standards in our attitude to animal welfare. We pay qualified researchers to conduct animal experiments that would land the rest of us in jail if we performed them o
科学使我们能够在我们的态度采取双重标准,动物福利.我们向合格的研究人员进行的动物实验,将土地监狱我们其余的,如果我们在执行他们的家庭宠物.公会规定如何对待动物可以在医疗和农业研究的基础上,之间的实用价值的信息寻求微妙平衡的艰辛和痛苦造成的限制.我认为这是合理的,但死亡或致残的纯知识的好奇心的动物不是.
如果我们要发展与环境的关系,使我们免遭毁灭它,我们必须承认,对其他生命形式不只是为了发展我们的利益.我认为,生物和环境伦理应包括所有的生物科学课程以同样的方式,这是道德的医学课程的组成部分.应培训生物学家问自己,我们的代表,无论是我们集体的好奇心满意理由杀害或残害动物.
最重要的是,我认为所有的科研论文应携带的语言,一般人可以理解一个简短序言,证明了这项研究.这篇序言应平衡的智慧和动物使用.如果实验也在我们的名义进行的,我们应该意识到的目的和价格.这将大大有助于消除恐惧了漫长的道路,科学家没有对自己的行为负责.它还将加强内部科学界认为,其工作应在这个星球上所有生命的利益,并非只有人类.